claude-botandClaude Opus 5 b1f5d6dcbc
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci-scripts-test Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci-manifests-test Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/pr-review Pipeline was successful
ci: explain the ci-k8s tag split and track the stale pins (#461)
Review noted this file pins ci-k8s at a newer dated tag than e2e.yml,
e2e-test.yml, alert-monitor.yml and issue-fix.yml, and asked for either a
stated reason or a follow-up so it does not read as an oversight.

There is no reason — the other four are stale. Per the latest-stable rule all
five should sit on the newest dated tag.

Not bumped here on purpose. Those four pipelines exercise different tooling in
the image and three are cron- or event-triggered, so none of them run on this
PR. Bumping them in this branch would ship four untested changes under cover of
a green run that never touched them — the same shape as the digest decay in
#458, where breakage sat unnoticed precisely because the affected jobs did not
run for months. Each wants its own verification, so it is tracked as #461
rather than smuggled in here.

Comment added above kustomize-build so the split is explained where a reader
meets it, pointing at the issue rather than restating the whole argument.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 21:49:42 +02:00
S
Description
No description provided
32 MiB
master
Latest
2026-01-31 15:05:31 +00:00
Languages
Go 32.8%
Shell 24.5%
Python 23.8%
Jinja 5.9%
HCL 5.1%
Other 7.8%